For those of you unfamiliar with the term, biohacking has been defined by Dictionary.com as “strategic biological experimentation, especially upon oneself, using technology, drugs, hormones, diet, etc., with the goal of enhancing or augmenting performance, health, mood, or the like.”
Author Tim Ferriss shared his thoughts on biohacking on an episode of the Money Rehab Podcast earlier this year.
Earlier this month, a Wall Street Journal columnist took the Dexcom Stelo Glucose Biosensor for a test drive an effort to improve her health and get a more thorough look at the impact of her lifestyle on her blood sugar.
The headline asks the big question: “A Glucose Monitor for Someone Without Diabetes: Optimal or Overkill?” Interestingly, I was wondering the same thing just a few days ago.
I have a few diabetic friends who use a wearable glucose monitor to keep track of how their body reacts to meals or when they need to eat something. And I’ve been intrigued by the devices and how they help people treat blood sugar issues.
Now that I’m older, I’m paying more attention to my health. Every six months, I undergo lab work with my doctor to monitor various markers and detect any potential health issues that can be easily treated and addressed.
I also use an Apple Watch and a smart scale to monitor various data points on a daily (and nightly) basis. So adding another diagnostic tool to my health toolbox isn’t a big stretch for me.
I’m still undecided about trying this product. At a price point of $99 for two devices (each device is suitable for two weeks), the price may be prohibitive for some people. It may be something I use periodically—every six months, or so.
As I continue thinking about this, I’m curious what your thoughts are. Leave a post in the comments below and let’s keep the conversation going.
PHOTO CREDIT: The Dexcom Stelo Glucose Biosensor
